Each film asks weighty questions: Is it personally worth it? Do the ends justify the means?

What sets Breach apart from Casino Royale and The Good Shepherd is that a main character answers "no."

Chris Cooper as Robert Hanssen, and Ryan Phillippe as Eric O'Neill

Breach is based on the true story of Robert Hanssen (Chris Cooper), the 25-year FBI veteran who was arrested in 2001 for selling U.S. secrets to the Soviet Union and Russia for most of his career. His espionage reportedly cost the U.S. millions in dollars and even more in lives. This is where the film begins—with actual footage of John Ashcroft's press conference about Hanssen's arrest. And then, the film rewinds to tell how it happened.

Hanssen's arrest was the result of the FBI's largest operation until that point—with over 50 agents working the case. In the end, the key player was an unproven 27-year-old up-and-comer, Eric O'Neill (Ryan Phillippe). O'Neill, working under the supervision of Special Agent Kate Burroughs (Laura Linney), posed as Hanssen's clerk to patiently observe Hanssen and secure evidence to catch the traitor in the act.

In realistically capturing the final days of the case, Breach packs good intrigue, tension and peeks at modern spy work. But in terms of plotting and action, it's fairly standard though effective. What truly makes the film is its success as a revealing character study of both O'Neill and Hanssen. Hanssen's downfall serves as a clear warning to young gun O'Neill, who finds that his dream job of FBI agent forces him to lie to his wife and live two distinctly different lives. The experience changes the cocky and ambitious O'Neill. He sees the dark side of his job: the sacrifices, the lies, the emotional pain. He sees the job changing him (and his marriage) in ways he doesn't want. His arc—true to the real life O'Neill's story—is realistic and redeeming.

Laura Linney as Special Agent Kate Burroughs

Still, the power of O'Neill's journey pales in comparison to that of Hanssen's—despite an admirable performance by Phillippe. This is the result of two main factors.

First, the film spends a great deal more energy on Hanssen's impulses, psychology and weaknesses than on O'Neill's. And rightfully so: Hanssen's story is fascinating. The film does a masterful job at delving into his mind and heart. But that leaves some of O'Neill's struggles and motivations less clear. If Hanssen's portrait is drawn in lush brushstrokes, O'Neill's is often dotted lines.

The second reason why Hanssen's journey dominates Breach is because Hanssen is played by the captivating Chris Cooper (Adaptation, Seabiscuit). While the film is a solid thriller in its own right, Cooper's performance itself will sell tickets. While possibly too early to create the needed Oscar buzz for 2008, Cooper deserves to be remembered at this time next year. He's that good. He commands the movie in such a haunting and powerful way that you can't look away while in the theater—or forget him out of it.

Kathleen Quinlan as Bonnie, Robert Hanssen's wife

As a self-righteous, cantankerous and intimidating veteran of the spy wars, Cooper's Hanssen makes your skin crawl. His nasty, hard and dismissive stare makes you nervous even in your cineplex seat—as if he's about to start judging you. He's scary and unpredictable. But then, Cooper does the almost unthinkable: He makes you understand where Hanssen is coming from, if not relate to him. You feel sorry for this fallen man. You see the good in him. And you see where the bad overpowers it. This is not a cardboard mustache-swirling bad guy—he's more of a better dissected and performed Anakin Skywalker being led down the path of evil by his inner demons and Achilles' heel.

It's no doubt that the three-dimensional characterization of Hanssen was partly possible because he's an easily researched and well-documented person who's still living. True humans are always far more captivating and complicated than fictional counterparts. Besides that, he's such an interesting dichotomy of a man. Really, there are two different Robert Hanssens portrayed in Breach. One is a deeply religious Catholic who has attended mass every day for years. He loves his family and his God with great passion. He is a well-respected and admired Russian analyst who'd do anything for his country. But the other Hanssen is an angry, judgmental man ruled by pride, lust and ego. He despises his superiors, thinks he can outthink anyone around him, and seeks any means to prove that "I matter plenty."

So which Hanssen is the real one? Breach thankfully doesn't answer that question. Instead, it seems to realistically present the case that no man is truly good or evil—but has the capacity for both. Hanssen is a man torn. Seemingly a patriot, he's also a traitor. Seemingly a follower of God, he also thinks he is a god. Seemingly a family man, he's also a pervert who shares covertly-recorded sex tapes of himself and his wife. The film ends with an amazing image of a man fallen—and knowing it.

Both men have good reason to look over their shoulders

Because of that, some viewers will see this movie as yet another Hollywood attack on Christians as judgmental and hateful hypocrites. And it's true: Many jaded non-Christians could easily see the movie's Hanssen—and thusly, the real one—as more evidence of the true ugliness of Christians. After all, the bad guy is shown praying often—and the good guy and his wife state that they'd much rather go to a movie than church. So, Christians don't look great here—except for Hanssen's devout wife, who gives a great speech about desiring to be a fully devoted Christian and not one who only selects the convenient parts to believe.

Coming on the heels of the very-public fall of Ted Haggard, some audiences will feel their view of Christians as archaic and intolerant is again confirmed. After all, Hanssen says things like "God expects you to live your faith" followed by judgments like "I don't approve of women in pant suits." He is shown praying—and then harshly bashing homosexuals and abortion-advocates. He condemns the actions of many, but is also guilty of equally disgusting sins.

Because the movie is based pretty faithfully on real events and people, it does prove that Christians like this exist. We'd all admit it. But hopefully the majority of viewers will move past any possible connotation about all Christians to a larger message about all humans. At best, the film can be seen as an illustration of Mark 7:20-23 and James 1:14-15—demonstrating how evil in the human heart sets dangerous sin traps which can ensnare anyone, including those trying to live a godly life.